Interviewer: When a colleague is sick, how much will you donate? Post-95's answer is too domineering
Whether it is a rookie who has just debuted or a seasoned old fritter, we will face many questions that are asked when applying for jobs. In order to make employees' values align with the company's values, some companies often ask some very strange questions in interviews. Today, the editor will share with you an interview topic, which involves colleagues’ illness and donations. Let’s see how the following three responsibilities responded!
Interviewer: When a colleague is sick, how much will you donate? Post-95's answer is too domineering
Job Seeker 1:
Li Na is a college student who just graduated. She was interviewed at this company for the first time. She passed the first two rounds. The third round was the interview with the boss of the company. At the beginning, the interviewer said, "How much will you donate when your colleague is sick?" To Li Na's surprise, she prepared a lot of questions that she might be asked, but she never expected to ask them. Li Na replied: "Donation itself is a kind of public welfare activity. I will donate according to my own situation. However, how much I can donate depends on my personal ability. After all, I just graduated and have no money. Another point, I must Put the money in the hands of your colleagues, because I don't really believe in organizing donations."
Interviewer: When a colleague is sick, how much will you donate? Post-95's answer is too domineering
Job Seeker 2:
Chen Qiang has two years of work experience, and I didn't expect to be asked such strange questions. Chen Qiang's answer was: "If I have a good relationship with this colleague, I will try my best to help, but donations are also important. It doesn't work, because it can't solve the problem at all, and if you want to solve the problem, you first need to have an insurance mechanism so that employees can afford medical treatment."
Interviewer: When a colleague is sick, how much will you donate? Post-95's answer is too domineering
Job Seeker 3:
Lin Xiuli, an intern who did not graduate from the post-95s generation, was very angry at the interviewer's question. She said, "I don't know what your company wants to know through this question. Is it testing our love or morality? Just say When I was studying, our school often organized donations, blood, etc., but the love was always used by people with a heart. If this happens in the company, I will still give my love, but I hope not to use donations How much to judge whether you have love, but donate according to your ability. Also, I especially hate the way of making donations. If your company wants to use the amount of donations to measure whether the job seeker is kind and caring, then, sorry, Our values are not aligned."
Afterwards, Lin Xiuli got up and left, and the interviewer was stunned, unable to regain her senses.
Interviewer: When a colleague is sick, how much will you donate? Post-95's answer is too domineering
There are thousands of interview questions, but the most unacceptable is the moral kidnapping, which is also the most sensitive. It is a wrong approach to use money to measure whether a person is truly loving. How much a person donates has nothing to do with his kindness and love. Which one do you agree more with the replies of the three asking for responsibility? Welcome to reply in the comment area.