Why do leaders like to pick on subordinates to cause conflicts, but they haven't completely resolved them? It turns out that there is so much profound knowledge!
There is a classic saying in the workplace. If your organization is very calm and there are no problems, it means that the organization has a big problem. Because it is too calm, it is a problem in itself. Behind him, there are many problems. It is hidden and not discovered, and once the conflict erupts, it will be out of control. This is why leaders like to think about provoking conflicts. Specifically, there are the following points:
[1] It is more conducive to management to prevent the leader from directly becoming the protagonist of the contradiction. No organization can be perfect, and the leader of this organization, that is, the managers we usually talk about, must not become the protagonist of the contradiction. The best positioning is for the leader to be a referee. Speaking of which, everyone should understand that the leader must provoke some competitive relationships. This is why the leader will formulate many rules of the game and engage in various PKs. It will provoke all kinds of contradictions, which can stimulate everyone's sense of competition and achieve better performance.
[2] When the referee’s desire for power dictates—the leader’s consideration is more selfish, because when the referee can decide many things, it must play a guiding role, for example, the leader proposes something, if there are some people who disagree When they appear, leaders will create conflicts, guide this kind of public opinion, guide this kind of atmosphere, and finally form the scope of leadership-led leadership, rather than the spontaneously formed atmosphere below. This is called a part of cultural construction.
[3] Local problems can be solved quickly - if you don't let conflicts erupt, this problem will never be solved from the root. Therefore, stir up conflicts between each other, let the problems be quickly exposed, and then take out The solution is to put out the fire quickly, so that the fire will not burn to the extent that it cannot be extinguished, and it will be too late to deal with it.
[4] Become the fuse for the exposure of problems - we know that there is a fuse for the exposure of anything, and these contradictions created for the leaders are the fuse. With this fuse, many problems will be hidden. Rise up, everyone looks good on the surface, I'm good, everyone is good, but each has his own small calculus in his heart, which is not conducive to the unity and coordination of the organization.
[5] Firmly grasp the initiative of control - only in this way can the leader firmly control the situation. When encountering many people who are not convinced, the leader will focus many conflicts on these people, and then intervene Go in and take care of you. Therefore, being a leader is not as simple as we think, and sometimes it is quite complicated. It takes a lot of thought to be a good leader.