These 5 cities cannot retain college students, and the brain drain is serious. 'Making wedding dresses for others'
These 5 cities can't retain college students, and the brain drain is serious. "Making wedding clothes for others" can't retain college students in the list of cities. Wuhan is the saddest, and Nanjing and Xiamen are on the list.
What is the most expensive in the 21st century? talents, especially highly educated and high-quality talents. In recent years, some first- and second-tier cities in China have introduced various preferential policies in order to attract talents. However, there are also some cities. Although they have good local college resources and they have repeatedly given preferential welfare conditions to graduates, many college students still vote with their feet and go to Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Hangzhou after graduation.
Today, the author will introduce 5 cities in China that cannot retain college students.
- Wuhan City.
Wuhan is known as a university town, with 89 colleges and universities, including 985 universities such as Wuhan University and Huazhong University of Science and Technology, which has the largest number of college students in the world.
However, on the other hand, the number of college students who choose to stay in Wuhan after graduation is less than half.
Rich in peaches and plums, but can't keep the fragrance. Every year, Wuhan plays a tragic role of "making wedding dresses for others", watching the graduates it cultivated by itself go to other places.
Poor urban planning, production-oriented industrial structure, lack of innovation and underdevelopment of the Internet economy, it is indeed difficult to retain young people.
- Changsha City.
Compared with Wuhan, Changsha may be a more livable city, but it is not suitable for "happy work".
Therefore, although Changsha's higher education resources are not bad, and both Central South University and Hunan University are good universities, the number of companies that Changsha can handle is really limited.
Not to mention the Internet companies that are good at it, far behind Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and even Wuhan. Internet companies have the highest employment intention among young people.
- Xiamen City.
Xiamen's college resources may not be so developed, the best school is Xiamen University. However, the brain drain rate in Xiamen is quite high. The data I have seen is that the outflow rate of young people aged 16-35 is 37.26%.
Xiamen is suitable for tourism, but it is really not suitable for living. On the one hand, Xiamen's local industry is limited and its economy is also limited, and it is too dependent on the development of tourism. On the other hand, Xiamen's high housing prices and wages have not kept up, which is really overwhelming young people.
- Nanjing City.
Nanjing is definitely a big city of education, no matter from the perspective of the number of colleges and universities, or from the perspective of 985 and 211 famous schools.
However, the embarrassing thing about Nanjing is that it is not as developed as Suzhou, which is a province, and it is far inferior to Shanghai and Hangzhou than the Internet industry and emerging industries. When it comes to Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, most young people choose to go to Shanghai or Hangzhou, and those in this province prefer to go to the gentle city of Suzhou.
- Tianjin City.
In recent years, Tianjin City has actually been badly sung. The reason is also very simple. On the one hand, the innovation is not enough, and it still adheres to the traditional industrial development, and has not carried out industrial transformation like Suzhou. On the other hand, although it is a municipality directly under the central government, the halo is completely overshadowed by Beijing. Tianjin seems to have been slow for half a beat, and has been overtaken by many new first-tier cities.
Likewise, college students cannot be retained.
Not only these cities, but also cities like Chengdu and Shenyang are also eager to retain young people.
Perhaps the crux of the question is, what should a city do to retain young people? For young people, what they value is salary level, development space and urban environment. For cities that want to retain young people or attract young people, developing from these aspects may be more effective than "snatching people".