Postgraduate entrance examination: The number of applicants has increased sharply, the difficulty has increased, and it is even more difficult to graduate from graduate school. Is it worth it?
Regarding the postgraduate entrance examination, I would like to say three things first.
The first is that the number of applicants for the postgraduate entrance examination continues to rise, and it is expected that the number of applicants for the postgraduate entrance examination will reach a new high. In the next few years, the number of postgraduate entrance examinations will continue to increase.
Second, since the beginning of this year, the Ministry of Education has issued several documents, requiring strict regulation of postgraduate enrollment and training, and emphasis on postgraduate teaching.
Third, not long ago, Guangzhou University, Hefei University of Technology and other colleges and universities expelled many postgraduates, it is impossible for postgraduates to live, and strict entry and strict exit will be further implemented.
Taken together, it is not difficult for us to analyze a conclusion: it is becoming more and more difficult for graduate students to pass the examination, and even if they pass the examination, it is more and more difficult to graduate.
Therefore, some people are also asking the author: Is the postgraduate entrance examination worth it?
Some people think it's not worth it. Now the devaluation of academic qualifications has become more and more serious, and there are more and more graduate degrees. If you did not study in a good major or a good school, then it is very likely that after you graduate in three years, you will not be as competitive in the job market as your college classmates who have worked for the same period for three years. Many companies now pay more attention to work experience when recruiting.
Another point is that this society is developing too fast now, many technologies are changing faster and faster, and there are too many new changes in three years. And you may have limited exposure to new things in three years on campus, and it will take some time to adapt to this changing society after graduation.
Of course, there are a lot of people who think it's worth it.
Since more and more people choose to take the postgraduate entrance examination, it shows that the postgraduate entrance examination itself is a worthwhile thing, otherwise why do everyone want to take the examination?
Secondly, from the three things that the author said at the beginning, it can be seen that the state is paying more and more attention to postgraduate education, and postgraduates are strictly in and out, and the gold content of postgraduates will be higher and higher in the future. good thing.
Then, when it comes to the theory of devaluation of education, this is even more nonsense. It is because of the depreciation of academic qualifications that undergraduates are worthless, so everyone will think about continuing to improve their academic qualifications and postgraduate entrance examinations.
Moreover, the theory of devaluation of academic qualifications itself is untenable. In our society, academic qualifications have not depreciated at all, and good academic qualifications will only increase in value. If you believe in nonsense such as the theory of devaluation of education, then you really lose.
Therefore, on the whole, the author's point of view is: the postgraduate entrance examination is worth it! And in the future, the gold content of postgraduate degrees will become higher, and postgraduates will be more valuable!
The author also would like to suggest that these types of people must be admitted to postgraduate studies: medical majors; undergraduate schools are generally used to improve their academic qualifications through postgraduate entrance examinations; some first-tier cities require a postgraduate degree in order to be registered.
Finally, what do you think about the topic of whether the postgraduate entrance examination is worthwhile? Will you choose to study?