How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a 'halo'?

I shared a story about "Tencent interviewed for five rounds, and finally got hung up" (the original text can be viewed ""Tencent interviewed for five rounds, and the interview was rejected": In the face of opportunities, no choice is innocent").

This young man can persist until the fifth round, indicating that he should have passed the test in terms of professional skills. The reason for the final suspension is said to be:

The previous company was not well-known, too small, and the projects it did were mediocre, so the professional background was not good.

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

This kind of result is unlikely to be accepted calmly, and it is somewhat uncomfortable. After all, the matter of "professional background" is actually easy to know from the beginning. But it does raise a real question:

Are people without background halo destined to have no chance?

1、

Recently, cinemas have been opened one after another, and many classic movies are being re-screened, among which is a well-known work-"Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", directed by Chris Columbus.

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

Speaking of which, the film was released in 2001, and it can be said that it has achieved great success, and it has also achieved a lot of people.

However, what many people don't know is that when the novel was successfully adapted into a movie more than 20 years ago, there were many people who wanted to direct the play, and Chris was not in an advantage.

In a 2012 interview, he recalled:

When I told the agent that I wanted to make this material into a movie, the agent told me: "Then there are 50 other directors in your queue who also want to make this story", and then gave a list of Rob Reiner, with Steven Spielberg...I thought: "No matter how hard I try, I'm not going to get this job".

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

How big was the gap between Chris and Spielberg at the time? Here's a simple example:

Chris began to have a strong interest in film in 1975;

And this year, Spielberg has won the 33rd American Film and Television Golden Globe Award for Best Director in the movie category for his film "Jaws".

Still, having said that, Chris went to the interview and prepared the best he could: He brought a script he had drafted.

Generally speaking, the director does not need to write the script before he officially takes over the film, because this work is very time-consuming. But Chris did, and it took two weeks, without any pay.

When asked why Chris was chosen to direct, the producer said:

Chris has boundless enthusiasm and he has completely figured out how he wants to get there.

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

Later, Chris himself admitted, "It was about that moment that they realized that I was very, very serious about making this material into a good movie."

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

Chris can seize this opportunity, on the surface, it seems to be because of "passion", because he wants to do it, but I think there is another very key point, that is "he already wants to do it, and has given a plan" , the "script" that took two weeks to draft.

At the same time, the more famous directors who are competing at the same time believe that they must have their own ideas for this material, but Christo took a step: he presented the ideas that were only in his own mind, and let the producer know that he was ready. All right.

After all, talking is one thing, doing is another.

The impact of the two is completely different.

2、

In the same movie, there is also an interesting selection of a role, that is Rupert Grint who plays Ron Weasley.

"Harry Potter" is Rupert's debut, with no previous experience in film and television. He says:

The first time he knew that when he was casting a role, he saw the instructions "send a form and a picture of yourself", so he did it, but a month passed and there was no news at all.

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

If Rupert had been waiting, there would have been no more.

Indeed, Rupert said later that he saw someone send a video, and he made a copy and got an audition.

How can job candidates stand out in interviews without a "halo"?

When doing this interview, Robert was still a child, and he spoke very calmly without too many ups and downs.

However, don't wait foolishly, know what your competitors are doing, and then follow up quickly, so that you don't miss the opportunity.

Many times, we are a little overwhelmed when faced with the resume of the sea, or the interviewer's "we will notify you when there is news". At this time, since the result will not be worse, why not take the initiative?

There are many ways, such as:

When sending a resume, don't really just have a "resume".

If it is an email, include a statement of job-seeking intention of about 100-300 words;

If it is a software APP, add a simple greeting to let the other party feel your enthusiasm and strong intention; or attach one or two related works, etc.

Or, like Rupert, pay attention to the other party's dynamics during the waiting time, then follow up and adjust, and learn the "effective" method of the opponent. There is no opportunity that is not earned.

3、

Going back to the essence of job interviews, choosing and being chosen are actually mutual.

The game between the job seeker and the interviewer, whether it is the interviewer's question or the job seeker's performance, the final assessment is the match between the "person" and the "post".

Just as the producers of "Harry Potter" ended up choosing Chris to direct over other more famous people, the producers valued "passion" and "execution" over experience.

As the saying goes, "everything is inseparable from its roots", when we are worried that we have no "halo", we may have to think about it from another angle:

Opposite this post, what is the "halo" it needs?

Only a degree?

Only professional background?

Not necessarily, there may be personality, ideas, execution, and so on.

Our company sometimes uses the project system to do things, that is, temporarily assigns some people to form a project team. During the project time, these people handle the affairs of the original department on the one hand, and handle the project together on the other hand.

At this time, it is often found that even people who are often grouped together, when faced with different projects, the person in charge is not fixed.

The reasons are often:

This thing needs to be a little more lively;

This thing needs to be able to handle a little;

This requires a little more thoughtfulness;

This thing needs to move faster...

There is no good or bad, but "who is more suitable".

Therefore, when a job seeker is facing the desired position, even if there is no "halo" of education and professional background, it does not mean that you are "dark".

Doing a job well requires a lot of skills, abilities, and requirements, highlighting your best match, and then amplifying it is also a strategy.