Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

thumbnail

In the information age, everything can become an information group, a life group, a work group, and people's collections keep popping up messages. When you pick up the cup and put it down, pick up the mobile phone, swipe the group messages, a few groups down, time It has slipped quietly through the fingers.

A few days ago, the office needed a combination of new people and leaders to join a work group because of the project. One of my colleagues was an old employee, and he was usually quite upright. After the leader assigned the task in the group, he asked this question in the group, the leader did not reply, and it was difficult for others to reply in the group, and the atmosphere was awkward for a time. The leader continued to release new news and tasks every other day, turning a blind eye to the old employee's problems. After the leader sent the message, he raised new possible problems. The leader still didn't answer, and everyone fell into silence again. . Everyone said in private that this employee was a little childish, and the leader didn't reply, but he kept posting it.

Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

Some people observed secretly with an attitude of eating melons, and saw that the leaders seemed to be less and less interested in seeing this old employee who loved to ask questions. Some people occasionally said in the group "Listen to the leader's arrangement!" The exchange of old employees is actually flattering the leaders.

The group is very strange. As long as the leader sends a message, everyone immediately responds with "OK" and "Received". However, when someone asks questions about the progress of the work, they fall into a vicious circle of silence.

Can workgroups really improve work efficiency? How many group chats do you have on WeChat or DingTalk? How many groups do not have the message do not disturb function turned on?

Humans are social animals and need to walk in groups. In an information society, all kinds of news are flooding in. We are more closely connected by the Internet, and people are more distant. You may be in N groups, but you will lose all kinds of news and be isolated because you are not in another group. This is better than a group of people getting together to discuss things, and seeing you come and immediately silence your voice, is that you don't know what the group outside of you is talking about.

Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

  1. Is the work more efficient?

Sometimes, we forget the purpose and meaning of building a group, which is to improve efficiency. For some people who do not fit in with the group, it is necessary to establish several small groups outside the large group, at least one group without a leader, where everyone can speak freely. The group name should not be too close, otherwise it will be easy to confuse, and send the words that should not be sent to other groups.

Groups with leaders are desperately replying "OK", and groups without leaders are desperately complaining about the mess of work arrangements.

Sometimes you are thinking about a problem, but before you say it, you are led astray by other people's ideas. In the group chat, you said something to me, and for a long time there was no discussion about the result, but instead it became a show of various emojis.

Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

  1. Where does the time saved go?

Building a group is convenient for communication at any time, but where does the time saved go? It seems to be more efficient to solve problems face-to-face in a meeting. A single @person's message, everyone in the group should also click to take a look, one person, one action, everyone does this action at the same time, just like listening to the same sentence in a meeting.

What's even funnier is that sometimes the person who is @@ doesn't see it, and someone else needs to communicate with her alone, and let her speak in the group and squeak.

  1. The group bears an undeserved burden

Some leaders like to call in front and back, and the same is true in the group. If a task is assigned and someone does not reply, then it is a big taboo. Some leaders will notify all the news in the group, and they will not be notified if they cannot see it. No matter whether the matter is urgent or not, the employees should be responsible for it.

Is group chat taking too much responsibility? If there is a fire, do you have to rely on the group to spread the news? Don't the people who didn't receive it separately call to ask about the situation?

Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

  1. Why do you block messages

Some people say that "Circle of Friends Jiugongge" and "WeChat Voice 60-Second Square" are already the most patient-testing projects in history, and some people talk at length in group chats, and leaders repost articles late at night. How do I reply to this? Do you feel kidnapped by group news?

Has your life been interrupted by group chat messages? Did your parents hear the message prompt tone and kindly remind you to check your phone, and you took it and clicked the "Do Not Disturb" button.

Some people like to post things they think are useful to the group, and some people will ask about private matters in the group, such as asking for leave, such as who is not cooperating with work in other departments. You can't see other people's expressions in group chats. Behind the mobile phone, there may be contempt and ridicule.

Is the work group really good? Would people be more relaxed and productive without group chats?

If someone tells the truth and exposes a short story, the group will be silent for a moment, as if everyone was busy and didn't see it. Do you rarely speak in the group, and gradually become the silent majority? The group chat only left the cold arrangement tasks and reply tasks.

It seems that there is no discussion group, and the function of the email is not much different.

Related Posts