Strong leadership can bring out the elite, full of dry goods to teach you how to be a leader
Management must be ruthless! to make things happen
Whoever is "ruthless" can survive
In the early days of many businesses, the whole company is united and the work enthusiasm is high. Under limited conditions, they can often achieve better benefits. However, when the company enters a period of stable development, the employees' sense of crisis gradually loses, and what's worse, the boss also loses the sense of crisis, slows down the speed of operation, or even stops the operation directly.
- Affectionate leadership, ruthless management, ruthless system
The success of a business depends on the team, not the individual. A first-class enterprise must be an enterprise that values teamwork, and an enterprise that does not value teamwork and likes to work alone must be a first-class enterprise. Therefore, in business management, managers should also have team spirit.
- A leader should have the majesty of a lion and the wisdom of a fox
A powerful leader must have the majesty of a lion and the cunning of a fox. It can be seen that the manifestation of the ability to govern is manifested in two aspects, one is the courage to act, and the other is the ability to act wisely. Without courage, you will be indecisive; without wisdom, you will be arbitrary. Both are indispensable, both hands must be grasped, and both hands must be hard.
Second, companies do not need mediocrity
In modern enterprise management, the elimination system of the last position has also been paid more and more attention, and its role has become more and more obvious. It is not only suitable for enterprises, but also for government departments. From the employee's point of view, the elimination system of the last post is helpful for employees to discover their own shortcomings, prompting them to seek improvement, so as to better meet the development needs of the company. From an enterprise's point of view, the minimum position elimination system can meet the needs of market competition, help improve enterprise performance, and enable employees to receive better treatment, thus forming a virtuous circle.
- The system is the real boss
State-owned and state-owned laws, families have family rules, each enterprise should have its own set of rules, and this set of rules is a fair and reasonable enterprise system. If you don't have rules, you don't have rules, you have relationships, and employees are more likely to tell you the conditions, it's hard to impress. To establish an enterprise system, everything is subject to the system, which is the most reliable. Enterprises also need strict management systems. Only a reasonable system can ensure the work efficiency of employees and the long-term development of the enterprise.
The fundamental purpose of management is to reflect fairness and improve efficiency. To achieve this goal, there must be institutional guarantees. If there is no system, managers will lack standards when dealing with problems, and it is difficult to ensure fairness and efficiency. For example, when Europeans play football, spectators decide who takes the penalty. With rules like this, it seems fair and saves time and the hassle and hassle of deciding who's on and who's off.
System management can continuously optimize enterprise management. In the process of implementing the system and dealing with problems, we can constantly discover the defects of the system in practice, and then continuously improve the system. With the continuous improvement of the system, the enterprise management will also be continuously optimized. Otherwise, it will deal with any problem arbitrarily, and if the same thing goes wrong in the future, it will not be able to learn from its experience, and it will not know where to change it. In addition, there will be many artificial contradictions and increase the management cost.
Many tragedies can be avoided by managing businesses through public institutions. Why are there so many problems and even tragedies in enterprise management? The reasons are as follows: First, there is no system to follow, second, there is a system that is not followed, and third, the system is unreasonable.