Big winner: In the workplace, in the eyes of leaders, is rigorous rigor the talent that the company needs?

thumbnail

At the beginning of the film, Dapeng played a rigorous loan with a small amount of funds. Due to the insufficiency of procedures, he chose not to lend for the time being, but the president as the leader wanted him to lend first, and then fill in the legal person information.

Here we can see that rigor is not an employee who pleases the leader.

This kind of unpleasantness was magnified even more in the subsequent exercises, and it was magnified to be hated by every "hostage" and "police officer", and as a result, a series of questions worthy of reflection by the audience were generated.

Is this rigorous attitude really the kind of employees that companies need in the workplace?

Next, we discuss from three aspects:

What career life do the characters in the film reflect?

Is a rigorous and conscientious style of conduct beneficial to the business?

As an employee, what should we do to realize the greatest value to the development of the enterprise?

Big winner: In the workplace, in the eyes of leaders, is rigorous rigor the talent that the company needs?

  1. What career life do the characters in the film reflect?

  2. Colleagues represented by bank staff, police officer Yao and other hostages

In the eyes of my colleagues, being rigorous and explicit is a trick.

In the film, the exercise that ended easily was a rare vacation opportunity for the bank, and all colleagues were ready to take a break. However, because of the rigorous "not sloppy", everyone "acted with him".

This type of person represents the group in the workplace who caters to their superiors and leads "acting". They are content with the status quo, and treat their work only to do their job well and live by it.

  1. The "Third Party Exercise" represented by President Wu and TV reporters

In this exercise, President Wu was the person in charge of the bank and belonged to a "middle-level leader". After receiving the exercise notice, the first thing he thought of was to find a TV station for an exclusive interview and hot search.

In the workplace, as a middle-level leader, in order to promote and show merit, performance is often the top priority. We can treat the exercise as a project. All those who participate in the exercise can only become the background board in the end, and as the president The middle-level leaders of the company can show their faces in front of the camera and get the affirmation of their superiors.

And the same is true of TV reporters.

TV reporters, who have participated in countless reports of this kind, can be called "old fritters". From the initial "just pat, hurry up and stop work" to the later appearance after seeing "new materials" on the scene, it also reflects the enterprise. Among them, those old employees who have nothing to drink tea, and I will come first if I have something to do.

  1. The "big leader" represented by the chief of police

The chief of police is the absolute authority in the film, he is in charge of the overall situation, similar to the core power in a business.

When everyone looked down on the rigorous way of doing things, he was the only one who supported the young man to do things with peace of mind. In the play, he said a word to the strictness: "I appreciate your attitude towards the exercise, remember, the result is not important, be serious When it comes to work, each of us is a winner", which also became the title of the film.

It can be said that a police chief-like figure is the "helmsman" in the enterprise, who sees problems deeply and clearly, and is good at giving young people the opportunity to try.

Big winner: In the workplace, in the eyes of leaders, is rigorous rigor the talent that the company needs?

  1. Is a rigorous and serious style of behavior beneficial to the company?

In the film, when Jing Ji first received the task of playing the role of a robber, because he was unfamiliar with "business", he first refused.

In the workplace, the rigorous and serious behavior style will have this kind of reaction when doing things. In their view, they do not fight uncertain battles, so they are first rejected.

This is not a bad thing for the company. Many employees face this kind of "task assigned by the leader", they often slap their face and look fat, and wait until they can't complete the work smoothly before finding the leader to recognize the mistake. For the company, this This situation consumes manpower, financial resources and time, and is not the optimal solution.

For rigor, after the refusal is fruitless, it is believed that since the leader believes in his own ability, it must be taken seriously.

So he exercised, surveyed the terrain, stepped on points, made props, familiarized himself with the terrain, and involved escape routes. It can be said that in order to complete the task of the exercise, he made full preparations rigorously and seriously.

And this, is it not appreciated by enterprises?

Excellent companies need "spontaneous" employees, who have correct values ​​and a positive work attitude, and can deal with work spontaneously.

The intersection theory holds that as long as you do everything seriously, at the same time earn beneficial experience from everything, accumulate your human capital, and develop your core competencies.

Well, you can always find a little in the distance, which is the crystallization of all your past efforts, the fusion of all your knowledge, the accumulation of all your hard work and dedication.

As the intersection theory says, acting rigorously and conscientiously can continuously improve one's workplace competitiveness, and can also create actual value for the enterprise, so in fact, enterprises need rigorous and conscientious employees.

Big winner: In the workplace, in the eyes of leaders, is rigorous rigor the talent that the company needs?

  1. As an employee, what should we do to achieve the greatest value to the development of the enterprise

  2. Strengthen communication - liaise with leaders and colleagues

In the film, everyone was not friendly to rigor at first, including hiding from him in the office to look at the mobile phone, and everyone's impatience at the beginning of the exercise, all of which reflected everyone's doubts about the rigorous and serious style of acting.

But in the end, when I said those words in the face of the camera, it was considered a spiritual communication between myself and everyone:

"I work hard, but I was neglected by my family, misunderstood by my leaders, and excluded by my colleagues, but I still choose to be a good person."

At this time, everyone recognized the attitude and value of rigorous and serious work!

In the workplace, there is nothing wrong with being serious, but being misunderstood by others, so you should be good at communicating with leaders and colleagues in the workplace.

Communication includes three levels: awareness, behavior and organization.

The awareness level usually includes: emotion, knowledge, thought, etc.; the behavior level usually includes: actions, activities, habits, etc.; the organizational level usually includes: performance goals, action plans, team atmosphere, and so on.

Often, communication is about achieving positive goals.

From the three levels of consciousness, behavior, and organization, reaching a consensus on this information with leaders and colleagues can sometimes have a multiplier effect on carrying out work.

  1. Lead by example - influence those around you by your actions

Rigorous is to reverse everyone's opinion of him by leading by example, especially when the child who lowered his head and played with his mobile phone said the sentence: "The one who was beaten to death was the head of the bank!", everyone was "awakened", They began to support rigorous practices.

Seriousness is an attitude, and when this attitude begins to spread, it often affects the people around you. Therefore, it is very important to lead by example in the workplace.

Those who teach by example obey, and those who teach by words sue.

The meaning of this sentence is that teaching by example can make people around you accept it. Talking without practice will only make everyone argue with each other.

People are "infectious", and people can also be educated. Everyone knows that doing things seriously is a good thing, but most people are carried away by reality and forget their original beliefs.

Therefore, if you are a rigorous and conscientious employee, you must lead by example, and spread this advantage to the leaders and colleagues around you, so that they can recognize them, and then cultivate an excellent corporate culture.

Related Posts