Competition speech, how to stand out in the job interview competition defense (recommended collection)
Preparation before the defense
The purpose of recognizing the "test site" defense is to test whether a person is agile in response, resourceful in response, and organized in thinking, and second is to test a person's breadth of knowledge, height of thinking level, and depth of theoretical level. The most taboo situations in the defense are: unable to speak, incoherent, stammering, full of loopholes, etc. Therefore, first of all, you should pay special attention to answering the conversation quickly, and then express your thoughts in an orderly manner. Generally speaking, use "" First, second, third" or "first, second, then" and other structures are better to answer.
There are two types of analysis "question types": objective questions and subjective questions. Objective questions are questions with standard answers, and subjective questions are questions with multiple answers. Relatively speaking, there are very few objective questions, and most subjective questions. In this case, the benevolent sees benevolence, the wise sees wisdom, and candidates have a wide range of freedom to play, so they should be full of confidence and avoid panic, as long as they are not outrageous and have no obvious mistakes. , you can pass the level calmly, and if you can do it from time to time, the spark of new ideas will burst out, the effect will be better.
Prediction of "examination questions" The purpose of the job competition is very clear, that is, the candidate proves that he is more competent for a certain position than others by explaining and elaborating on issues such as experience, performance, advantages, and work assumptions. The questions of the judges are mainly raised from these aspects: including questions related to your experience, questions related to the position you are applying for, questions related to your position, questions related to policies, and so on. As a candidate, you can focus on these aspects in advance, make specific questions that may be raised, and draw up an outline of the answer in a general, concise and organized manner in advance. If the questions raised by the judges are the same or similar to the questions you thought about in advance, you can talk calmly and eloquently. If the questions raised are different from your assumptions, you can also graft with tact and flexibly assemble them. In short, it will not be on the spot "Choke", embarrassed.
Intentionally "setting up" means consciously putting forward some concepts, ideas or questions during the preparation of the competition speech, but not making in-depth and detailed expositions, and in the process of speaking, it is very natural to slow down and strengthen Tone and other methods highlight these "question sets", attracting the attention of the judges, and "tempting" the judges to ask questions. For example, when a candidate talked about the idea of doing a good job in market research, he specifically talked about the concept and method, and the third layer only subtly mentioned a sentence in an emphasized tone: "In addition, pay attention to strengthening the Team building of the sales department." Sure enough, one of the judges asked, "What measures are you going to take to strengthen team building?" Seamless.
Response in defense
The defense process is full of "variables". Under the premise of full preparation, you should also master some ways of adapting.
"Bullshit" won't waste time. When the judges ask a question and you don't know where to start, you might as well say a few nonsense and take over the words first, such as "Your question is very good, this is A question that I should take seriously in my future work", "The question you just raised is: why is it said that quality is the lifeblood of an enterprise? Why is it said that quality is the lifeblood of an enterprise..." and so on, although such words are nonsense, But it is also in line with people's oral habit of answering questions. Using such words, you can gain limited but precious time, organize your thinking, collect materials, and then explain it in a clear-cut way. The role of nonsense should not be underestimated.
"Formulas" are not absurd to stop many jobs statically. Although the nature of the work is different, the rules of work and the measures for doing a good job are similar once they are summarized and refined, such as strengthening learning, improving systems, taking measures in place, ensuring funds, and highlighting key points, etc. , when the judges ask questions such as "what measures are you going to take to do a good job", and you are not familiar with these jobs, you can make appropriate contact to stop them.
"Nice words" are not false and rationalize emotions. Sometimes the judges' questions are not so much a question as an opinion, and they are indeed "ruthless" and "diabolical" when they are raised on such a special occasion. Be careful, you will not be able to step down. When answering, don't say big and inappropriate words, let alone say irritating words. The best choice is to say "good things", sincerely admit the shortcomings, and promise to pay attention to improvement in the future. For example, a judge asked: "The General Office should be a comprehensive service department. Why can you get tickets for leaders on business trips, but our employees can't get tickets on business trips?" Such a question cannot be explained clearly in one or two sentences. A candidate answered this way: "In our work, such a problem may indeed occur, and I am deeply sorry for it. I didn't do it well last time, and I will do it next time. If you encounter such a problem , you can put it directly to me, and I will do my best." A few good words made the questioner and others feel very warm.
The "joke" has a good and relaxed atmosphere. Sometimes the judges' questions are hard-edged, forcing you to express your position on the spot and putting you in a dilemma. For example, several judges invariably challenge a comrade who is competing for the director of infrastructure construction: "Our unit wants to recruit XX acres. Land, can you guarantee that you will get the land within a year?" "I will give you a bonus of 200,000 yuan, can you complete the task on time?" There is no problem at all. It is deceiving the leaders and the masses. Even if you give me 200,000 US dollars, I don’t dare to guarantee it. Generally speaking, the problem can be solved within a year, but as far as I know, there are a few people on that land. Ten farmers, demolition is the most troublesome problem in the process of land acquisition. If you encounter a few nailed households, the progress will be affected, but I will try my best to solve the problem.