Why is it difficult to keep people in private companies with high wages, but easy to keep people in state-owned companies with low wages? It hurts to tell the truth
I have worked in both state-owned enterprises, central enterprises and private enterprises, and I have found a common phenomenon: both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises envy each other. State-owned enterprise employees envy private enterprises with large development space, while private enterprise employees envy state-owned enterprises with less work and closeness to home, ease and safety. face.
After all, the mouth says so, but the body is very honest. It is very interesting that employees of private companies have the right opportunity to work hard to run to state-owned enterprises, while most employees of state-owned enterprises dare not give up their daily scolding jobs and run to private companies.
Therefore, some people ask: Why is it difficult for private enterprises to retain people with high wages, while state-owned enterprises are easy to retain people with low wages? Looking at the behavior of most people, it seems that the situation is very simple, but the truth is even more troubling!
Why is it difficult to keep people in private companies with high wages, but easy to keep people in state-owned companies with low wages? It hurts to tell the truth
In fact, the biggest problem lies in the "psychological cognition" of many of us, especially many elders have such a cognition in their hearts: "If you enter a unit, your ability will be dead from now on and will not increase. , once unemployed, there is no way to survive in society, even if it is not so miserable, this generation will be displaced.
They think of work more like marriage. The first one is the original spouse. If you leave the original spouse, you must be in a mess. Then the first criterion for the original spouse is to be able to keep a family and live. Putting it in the enterprise is to ensure that there is no risk of unemployment.
Why is it difficult to keep people in private companies with high wages, but easy to keep people in state-owned companies with low wages? It hurts to tell the truth
Therefore, every graduation season, parents scramble to educate their children to enter state-owned enterprises. If the national examination fails, the local examination is required. If the big cities cannot stay, they will go to the countryside, and then they will be transferred up to save the country. In short, they will occupy the pit first. When I asked them why they didn't go to foreign companies with higher salaries, most of them answered "Because foreign companies will lay off employees, they don't know how many years they can work." Typical poor thinking, weak thinking.
Indeed, from the current point of view, compared with private enterprises, state-owned enterprises do have less work pressure, and it is good to enjoy the shade by leaning against a big tree. Even a big private company like Huawei needs to be cleaned up at the age of 35. Even if Jack Ma and Wang Jianlin are the richest man, they still don't have the "must-have" beer belly because of what? Because I'm tired!
Why is Jack Ma so tired? The world is changing so fast that it is a question of whether or not you will be able to sit at the poker table 10 years from now, so you have to fight. The richest man does not dare to stop and enjoy it. So, are state-owned enterprises really an iron job?
Why is it difficult to keep people in private companies with high wages, but easy to keep people in state-owned companies with low wages? It hurts to tell the truth
Let's take the 1990s as an example, state-owned enterprises laid off a large number of employees in order to get rid of the predicament of losses. Tens of millions of people bought out at one time, and after getting rid of the "burden", state-owned enterprises went into battle lightly, and some enterprises with monopoly positions and policy advantages came back to life and became bigger and stronger. . Therefore, it is a false proposition that there will be no unemployment in state-owned enterprises.
Don't say that state-owned enterprises do not have 100% guarantees, and many biological units have no guarantees either. Now that the second child is encouraged, how long will the spring of the family planning committees who are good at sterilization and fines in the steak house last? People, don't pin your destiny and hope on others. Once winter comes, what will you keep for yourself?
Why is it difficult to keep people in private companies with high wages, but easy to keep people in state-owned companies with low wages? It hurts to tell the truth
A few decades ago, the mantra that parents told their children was: "Learn more, don't be afraid of getting tired, and be honest and work hard"; today, most parents tell their children to "work in class, be relaxed, and don't ask people to change units." It's also heart-wrenching!
In fact, the workplace is always a "selective exam". In any industry, the top 1% of people will never starve to death, and it is impossible for 100% of people in an industry to sit back and relax. As long as you have developed your skills in the market and made it to the top 1%, why should you worry about unemployment?
Do you think that after 20 years, private enterprises or state-owned enterprises will stabilize?