Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
I believe that most people in the workplace hate infighting, which consumes both energy and emotions, but why is this kind of infighting still common in the workplace, and even some leaders take the initiative to provoke subordinates to infight? On the surface, many leaders say that they want to unite with sincerity, but they often suppress some people secretly and win over some people. Why is this? The truth is very disturbing!
Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
In fact, the leader has difficulties in doing so. He not only has to face the pressure of ratings, the promotion and replacement of subordinates, and the assessment of superiors, etc. In fact, many leaders are only glossy on the surface, and the grievance and pain in their hearts are only themselves. Know. From a specific analysis, the reasons why leaders provoked infighting among subordinates can be divided into these four reasons:
- Demonstrate the value of leadership
Only when the subordinates are discordant can the leader have the value of existence. If the subordinates can work and collaborate spontaneously and in unity, then the boss will let the leader get out, because there is no meaning for this management position to exist. Only when subordinates have problems and there are various frictions can the importance of leadership be highlighted. If the workplace has been sorted out very calmly by the leaders, then the leader will end up being a donkey that is slaughtered.
Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
- Real-time understanding of the real situation at the grassroots level
Only when the subordinates are not in harmony can the leader understand the following situation in a timely manner. If the relationship between the subordinates is very harmonious, then they will cover up the problems and unite together to act in front of the leader. When the company collapses, the leaders will Being kept in the dark is the most taboo of the management. As a leader, it is unacceptable for the bosses to not know what their subordinates are thinking, their real situation and strength. But as long as the subordinates disagree, there will be someone who will give the leader a small report, trying to gain attention and reuse, and the leader will naturally be able to keep abreast of the situation at the grassroots level.
Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
- Maximize your own interests
Only when the subordinates are at odds can the leader's interests be maximized. No one looks down on the other, and no one looks down on the other. If they want to climb up, they will try to get the support of the leader, so as to obey the leader more. Don't dare to go west. Only when the leader speaks the truth can we grasp the initiative of management. Therefore, in order to maximize their own interests, leaders will naturally find ways to differentiate their subordinates, so that they cannot be united against themselves.
Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
- Consolidate one's rights and status
Only when the subordinates are in discord can the leadership's power be stabilized. This is like crabs in a cage. They will not escape unless they pull each other. The same is true in the workplace. Threats to leadership. If your subordinates are very united, it often means that they are likely to put you on the air, various orders cannot be implemented, and even they will go against everything, then your leadership position will be very difficult to guarantee, and the good days will come to an end. .
Why do infighting leaders in the workplace not only ignore, but even provoke?
You must understand that the less harmonious the relationship between subordinates in the workplace is, the less they are against the leader, or the less they have the strength to oppose the leader. The reason, because they are all people who are very good at buying people's hearts, and they are also the people who are the most threatening to the stability of the leadership's position.