If your leader is a villain, is it still useful to observe the details of the leader?

In the workplace, we have always emphasized the need to study your leadership, observe your leadership, and get better recognition from the leadership through various details, but some friends ask, what if their leader is a villain? Is it still useful to observe the details of leadership?

> > Liu Wei is an aspiring young man. After many screenings, he finally chose a company that he felt could improve himself and help his future development. He also knows that the workplace is different from school, and ability alone can only give you a firm foothold. The key is to look at the leadership, so he usually pays attention to observing and studying his own leadership. After three months, through observation, he found that His own leader has a bad character and likes to take advantage. The people who use it are those who are flattering people, a standard villain. Liu Wei felt that he was very uncomfortable, so he resigned. >

In fact, no matter who the leader is, this kind of observation is useful. It has nothing to do with the gentleman and the villain. It has to do with power. If you don't observe him, how do you know that he is a gentleman? If you don't observe him, how do you know he is a villain? You can only get more information by observing and judging, and you come to the conclusion that it has nothing to do with your workplace. Whether he is a gentleman or a villain, your promotion is useless for your promotion. The conclusion you have to get is not only the simple division of right or wrong, but the details.

You have to observe your leader to know what kind of person he likes. Does he like to talk about poetry and songs, or does he like someone with strong work ability? You focus on what kind of person the leader is. It doesn't make any sense in itself. Whether he is a real gentleman, a hypocrite, or a villain, these people have to eat and drink whatever they like, hot or cold water, personal preference What is it, what is the behavior pattern, how does he get his power, how does he manage it, what kind of people he likes to reuse, what kind of people he has a special affection for, what kind of people he will give value to, This has nothing to do with the gentleman.

For example, if he scolds a person all day long, and then keeps giving him a raise and promotion, it doesn’t matter whether he scolds or not, this is the performance. Do you think this is a good person if you don't give you more than a dime and just let you work? These things cannot be limited to the surface to judge a person, but must be based on his ultimate behavior. He can't hide these things. Therefore, what is good in the top and what is better in the bottom, the gentleman and the villain have their own ways.

Observation is not just for villains or hypocrites, but by building up your behavioral data and then doing what you like. For example, if I hit you a few times now, you are upset now, if I say you are stupid, you will immediately refute, Even if you don’t refute, you will be very dissatisfied in your heart. When you say that your leader is doing something wrong, you shouldn’t do it. No matter what kind of person you are, you will feel unhappy in your heart. It’s just that he doesn’t have a seizure. Saying that there will be no problems, it is all unhappy, so no one will think highly of those who slap the table and stare at him, but can make himself comfortable, can bring value, and can carry out her orders in depth, he will only Feel good about this person. Anyone would like a man who does not respond to his commands, and another who immediately responds to the call.

Any behavior pattern is like this, it won't say that one day I like to eat scrambled eggs, the next day I hate scrambled eggs, there are very few such cases, so let's say, in this case, power is stable, most Everyone has stability, it doesn't matter whether the leader is a gentleman or a villain, observe him, and then do what he likes, there will be rewards.