High EQ but low ability, low EQ but high ability, who can succeed faster?
In today's workplace, there is nothing that cannot be solved with "emotional intelligence". If there is, then add blindly "speaking". In this world, "emotional intelligence" is already flying all over the world. Without EQ, nothing can be accomplished, and without EQ, no success. Emotional intelligence has become the "core element" and "precondition" of success. Is it a "disease" in this society? Or should "emotional intelligence" really sweep everything?
If it is said that people with high emotional intelligence and incompetence have the opportunity to rise to the top, but those who are empty and capable are destined to be difficult to succeed. In fact, many people see that others take the lead and become leaders, and they have to find some problems to calm their unbalanced hearts. In fact, as long as anyone can succeed, which one is not a very low attitude, and its humble attitude, perseverance in the heart, unremitting efforts, and hard-working style, in addition, you have to add a little luck, and only In this way, it is possible to cut a bloody path from the workplace and achieve success!
In fact, high emotional intelligence is also a kind of ability, and the relationship with leaders, colleagues, and customers is very good. Although there may be some problems, but people who can use high emotional intelligence to communicate with people, it should be said that they have no ability. Will be poor, at least have their own unique understanding of the workplace. Then look back, about the five levels of leadership, position, identity, production, building people, and peak. From this perspective, it is normal for them to take leadership positions.
On the other hand, Sora has a capacity. The lack of recognition of ability is actually the same as lack of ability, and the substitution of ability is not difficult. If you have the ability, but take an uncooperative attitude, not low-profile, not humble, not down-to-earth, and not able to unite the entire team, to be honest, the greater the ability, the more damage it may cause to the team. For a leader, no matter how great the ability is, but it cannot be used by me, it is meaningless to the leader.
The workplace has different requirements for the quality and ability of high-level, middle-level and low-level managers (leaders), which is exactly the opposite of the perception of grassroots workers.
Senior managers (leaders in high positions) are required to have strategic vision, scientific decision-making, macro grasp, risk determination, direction, grasp the middle level, and lead the team. Requirements for the so-called "emotional intelligence" (such as being able to speak, communicate, etc.) are relegated to a secondary position. Some entrepreneurs, bosses, and founders often reprimand their subordinates. The competition is fierce, and there is no need for emotional intelligence.
Middle-level managers (middle-level leaders), with high-level above and grass-roots below, are in a central position, upload and distribute, coordinate operations, and communication skills are prominent. You do not need to grasp the direction, nor do you need to make decisions, you need to implement the strategy. Middle-level personnel, who have to implement the requirements of the upper-level and take into account the feelings of the lower-level, are actually in a "clamp" position. Coaxing the superiors to be happy and coaxing the subordinates to work is the test of the ability and level of the middle-level managers. Over time, the weight of emotional intelligence becomes heavier.
The grass-roots managers (small leaders), the top is the middle-level, and the bottom is the specific staff. There are also requirements for ability and emotional intelligence. If you have no ability, you will definitely not be able to do it. If your subordinates do not do anything, the grass-roots leaders have to do it themselves. But it is absolutely impossible without emotional intelligence. You have no decision-making power, no distribution power, and no human rights. You can only "coax", "deceive" and "scare", otherwise, you will really not be able to play the grassroots team. People have only one mind, and grass-roots leaders have few minds and low emotional intelligence, so it is difficult to get ahead.