Is 'the saying' really true? Workplace 'common saying' lies revealed
At work, when talking about something or someone, I often hear some friends say, "As the saying goes...".
The so-called common sayings refer to words such as proverbs or aphorisms that are habitually said.
Since it is a word that people often say and agree with, it is naturally correct in the eyes of many people.
So, are these words necessarily correct?
Not necessarily, some are still worth thinking and analyzing, otherwise, it is very likely to lead us into the misunderstanding of thinking.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
01
"Whoever leaves, the earth turns the same"
A unit streamlined its personnel and arranged for some key business personnel to leave their posts in a "one size fits all" manner. Some people raised objections, but some leaders disagreed: "As the saying goes, whoever leaves, the earth will turn the same." Confused for a while.
That's right, the rotation of the earth doesn't stop because of someone. But you must know that the rotation of the earth has nothing to do with human beings. As early as 15 billion years ago, the earth was born and began to rotate.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
Some people may say that this is really just a metaphor. However, it is also wrong to despise talents and important people in this metaphorical way. Important people undoubtedly play a key role that ordinary people cannot or cannot play during critical periods.
From Qin Shihuang to Emperor Wu of Han, from Liu Bang to Zhu Yuanzhang, which time in history was the change of dynasty not driven by special characters?
This is the key role of important people. If they "leave", there will be different results.
Historical materialism also tells us time and time again that we must fully recognize the role of the masses in creating history, as well as the enormous role and indispensability of outstanding figures.
They tend to stand taller, see farther than the average person, are knowledgeable, sharp-minded, and have a stronger ability to resolve conflicts. The rotation of the earth is a natural phenomenon, and the need for talents for career development is a social phenomenon. It is obviously inappropriate to use the rotation of the earth as a metaphor for determining the value of talents.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
02
"A slap doesn't make a sound"
When there is a conflict or conflict between subordinates, some leaders will say: "Is this worth thinking about? As the saying goes, 'A slap doesn't make a sound'". Meaning, both sides of the conflict have problems, and if they are dealt with, they should be dealt with. So, indiscriminately, "five big boards each."
In reality, no one can slap a slap.
It should be known that contradictions and conflicts are not slaps after all. Slap is a behavior dominated by one's subjective consciousness. Two or more people form contradictions and conflicts. It is neither the consciousness of one person nor the common subjective intention. Some may be completely passive or even innocent.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
We know that in the handling of car collision accidents, there will be many situations in the sharing of responsibility for the accident. Some of them bear full responsibility, some do not bear responsibility, and some bear half or a small amount of responsibility.
To a certain extent, those who take full responsibility are "slapped with a slap".
When encountering a problem, it is "a slap that doesn't make a sound". It is actually a kind of lazy thinking, dealing with the problem in a simple and rude way. This lack of fairness and impartiality can only lead to new contradictions and conflicts.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
03
"The villain first, then the gentleman"
This phrase comes from the "Awakening the World Marriage Biography": "As long as the villain is good before the gentleman, it is not good for the gentleman after the villain." It means that before doing things, you should first state the conditions, and then you can talk about friendship and leniency. .
This sentence is often extended to work. For example, when the superiors explain work tasks to the subordinates, some will say: "Let's start the villain first, then the gentleman."
This is of course what I said in private, but there are problems with careful analysis.
The so-called "first villain" is nothing more than that all work is done according to principles, rules, and standards.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
But isn't that what it's supposed to be doing? It can be said that "there are no rules and no circles", and it is impossible to have high quality without high standards. But if you insist on doing this, how can you be a "little person"?
Could it be that a gentleman is a gentleman who does not follow principles, rules, standards, and responsibility? This phrase may be positive in personal interactions, but it is inappropriate for work.
A gentleman is a gentleman if he can always talk about principles, regulations, standards, and quality in his work; on the contrary, he is a hypocrite who has no principles, talks about human feelings, values face, and deceives the public.
Even if this "common saying" is used as a word for modesty, it should be "modest" instead of "modest", and it should not be abused.
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
04
"The Prodigal Son Returns For Nothing"
A young colleague in a certain unit has been in a backward state, and the long-term education has little effect. Later, because of a family accident, the unit helped to solve it. After being moved, the colleague's thinking has changed a lot and his work has made great progress. To this end, the leaders continue to praise him, and even propose meritorious awards.
In this regard, some comrades held different views, and the chief official immediately retorted: "Isn't it a common saying that 'the return of the prodigal son will not be exchanged'".
Is "the saying" really true? Workplace "common saying" lies revealed
The return of the prodigal son is indeed a gratifying thing. It is not an exaggeration to use the metaphor of "gold is not exchanged". Giving praise at the right time is also a measure to encourage him to continue to improve.
However, the so-called "gold is not exchanged" is mainly relative to itself. As for what kind of reward it should get, it should be moderate. Generally speaking, it should be a bowl of water, and adhere to the same standard as other comrades.
Some subordinates have always performed outstandingly, worked tirelessly, and achieved outstanding results. Wouldn't it be unfair if they didn't get the rewards they deserved because they didn't have the experience of "returning the prodigal son"?
Or because of this, there are individuals in some units who "spread scriptures" to young comrades: "Don't be so active at the beginning of work, be passive at first, then be active later, it seems that progress is fast."
This is probably the negative effect of individual leaders due to their misinterpretation of the phrase "the return of the prodigal son is not in exchange for money"?
Therefore, we must actively affirm and fully encourage the "prodigal son", such as passing the "good news" to his family, etc., but we must not lose due fairness in rewards, so as to dampen the enthusiasm of comrades who have always performed well.