HR Q: Why did you leave the previous company? What's the difference between a bad answer and a good answer?
Why did you leave your last company?
This is a high-frequency question that we will face during interviews, and it is almost a must for HR.
So why should HR ask you why you left your last company?
The most critical core point here is that HR needs to know what kind of work you can't accept.
Just like when we go on a blind date and find someone to live with, It is not the strengths and advantages of the other party that decides two people to go together, but whether you can accept his shortcomings and deficiencies in your daily trivial life.
Advantages and strengths are just the icing on the cake, but if you can't accept the shortcomings and deficiencies, life will be a piece of shit.
The same is true during the interview. The interviewer asks this question because he wants to know what kind of job you cannot accept, and under what circumstances you will leave our company. It is a question that fully considers the stability of employees.
The company's strengths can make you willing to follow it, but its shortcomings can make you feel on pins and needles and eventually leave.
When hiring people, HR considers nothing more than 3 points: Can you do this job? Are you happy to do it? Can we work together happily for a long time?
This question itself is open-ended, and our answer is also open-ended, and there are various answers.
It includes both subjective and objective aspects, which include unacceptable inaction of the leader, inability to get along with colleagues, unfair reward and punishment system in the company, deduction and oppression of employees, far from home, serious overtime, personal promotion encountering ceilings, etc.
Although the question is broad, our answers can determine HR's impression of us and whether or not to hire us.
HR Q: Why did you leave the previous company? What's the difference between a bad answer and a good answer?
Answer the three principles
- The answer should be precise and not general.
The so-called general talk is that it does not cut into the key points, for example, the original company's treatment is too low.
The treatment is too low, and there are many possibilities. The first is that the overall efficiency of the enterprise is not good, and the treatment is generally low. The second is that your personal ability is not strong enough to match the high salary. The third is that your position is not important in the company.
Why is it a general answer to "invalid"? Let's analyze it.
The poor business performance is an objective factor that you cannot control. Your lack of personal ability will reduce your advantage in this interview. The position is not important, it means that the work you do is of low value.
Either one is "harmful and unhelpful" for your interview.
We need to be relatively candid about our “pain points” when answering.
Pain points have two functions. One is to help HR to understand you correctly, to understand your unacceptable work status, and to facilitate your next steps. In addition, it also helps you judge whether the interview company is suitable for you in a short period of time, which is a win-win move.
- Show your dedication and achievements in your previous job.
Because no matter what kind of boss, they like people who can do their work beautifully no matter what the circumstances.
This not only reflects a person's attitude and ability, but also reflects a person's professional maturity, sense of responsibility, anti-stress, emotional regulation and management ability.
The most important point is the ability to calm down and handle the work well even when you are not satisfied with the environment.
HR Q: Why did you leave the previous company? What's the difference between a bad answer and a good answer?
- Compare the company you are interviewing with with the previous company to show your strong will.
And the point of this comparison, the best point is the point that made you leave the previous company.
For example, the direction you want to develop cannot be provided by the previous company, you have encountered a bottleneck, and this company happens to be very good in this area, and no other company can replace it.
In short, this comparison point is very sincere and reliable, and it is best to have the support and examples of actual data.
After all 3 points are explained, I believe that HR will greatly increase your favor.
bad answer
Example 1: "Our original leaders did things unfairly, the reward and punishment system was not implemented properly, and people complained a lot in private."
Example 2: "The company is too far from where I live, and I want to move closer."
Regarding discord with leaders and colleagues, the company's reward and punishment system is unfair. Most HRs know the answer, but we can replace the negative words with positive ones. For the same answer, we can say:
"I hope that the atmosphere of my company is strict with rewards and punishments, and the implementation is in place. The previous companies have not done enough in this regard."
This sentence shows positivity than example 1, and in 1, it says that complaining in private may make HR feel that you are not working hard enough, but participate in the complaint.
The company is too far away from the residence. This answer sounds understandable, but it has a fatal problem. Once the new company moves far away, will you leave your job?
If your performance is very good, the company wants to open a branch in another area and let you be the supervisor. Do you want to slap your butt and leave?
This is an invalid answer, and even makes HR feel that you can't bear hardship at all.
Or think you're trying to balance family and work, and you're bound to be distracted and unable to work overtime, so why should I hire you?
HR Q: Why did you leave the previous company? What's the difference between a bad answer and a good answer?
appropriate answer
Uncontrollable objective factors: The company's development is very limited, and new projects are becoming fewer and fewer. In order to optimize management and reduce costs, all operational positions have been cancelled.
My own achievements: In the past 5 years, I have been responsible for 3 projects, including market research and analysis in the early stage, operation and supervision in the mid-term, and promotion and evaluation in the later stage. I have led the team to achieve good results. performance (say specific numbers).
Comparing with existing companies: I understand that your company is developing in full swing in new projects. It has a certain city or area and needs senior operation management personnel. My previous work experience matches your company's needs very well. I think I can do the job and I'm very eager to join your company.
HR Q: Why did you leave the previous company? What's the difference between a bad answer and a good answer?