In the workplace, employees who follow these three types of leaders have the least future, no prospects, and bad luck!
In the workplace, the most important thing is to meet a good leader if you want to get along well, develop your abilities quickly, and get a promotion and a raise. Although it is said that meeting a good leader can be hard to find, but when encountering the three types of leaders mentioned below, employees have the least future and will not be promising. Following such leaders will be unlucky. Please read below:
- Small belly and chicken intestines, a leader who loves to be preoccupied with ================================================================================
Although some leaders are sitting in leadership positions, they are not very tolerant and care about everything. It's not good to see the subordinates, and it can't tolerate the unintentional offense of the subordinates. Once a subordinate accidentally offends him, he will always keep it in mind and look for opportunities to retaliate. The whole team was led by such a small-bellied leader, suffocating, smoky, not united or motivated.
This kind of leadership made me feel good for a while, but it hurt the whole team. The development of the team depends on the wise decision-making of the leader. If the leader is like this, can the members of the team still develop well? Or cast elsewhere sooner rather than later.
- Leadership that does not develop employees =============================================
As the saying goes: the disciples of the church starve to death the master. Although the leader is not the master of the employees, he is also worried that the subordinates will learn too much, which will affect their position. Therefore, some core methods or skills are never taught to the subordinates. This has resulted in a situation where leaders can only come forward to handle the situation at critical times; the growth of the entire team and employees is slow. On the other hand, the leader will blame the subordinate, how come it is still like this after coming in for so long, and he can't share the workload for himself at all. The anger on both sides is directed at each other.
For such leaders who are short-sighted and unwilling to train their subordinates, the ability of employees cannot be improved, and there is no hope of natural promotion and salary increase.
- Leaders who take advantage of themselves and push bad things out ===================================================================
Some leaders are very happy, and their subordinates have achieved a little bit of achievement. The leaders directly take it on themselves, so that the company thinks that it is the ability of the leader to make it. However, when something bad happens, this kind of leader immediately finds an opportunity to shirk responsibility cleanly, regardless of whether the subordinate is alive or dead at this time, and whether he needs to come forward to protect the subordinate. Things are done together by the whole team, all the benefits are taken away by the leaders, but the aftermath of the bad things is carried by the subordinates, and it is not good to leave it on anyone.
When employees follow the leader, not only will they not be able to get help and benefits, but they will also be discarded by the leader when they encounter problems, so such leaders must not be found.
In fact, the opposite of these three rules is to meet a good leader who is generous, willing to train subordinates, and does not compete with employees.
What kind of leader do you hate the most? Feel free to share your views in the comments section!