Why can't the elites in the workplace see the essence of the problem?

elite

Pharaoh has been so busy this week that he doesn’t have time to sit still and think. Today Friday, I got up early in the morning and sat for an hour, and then I reviewed and thought about it, and talked about why the elites in the workplace can’t see the essence of the problem?

When many elites in the workplace encounter problems, they may find the solution to the problem immediately, but it may not be the solution to the real problem; while for some elites in the workplace, when encountering problems, it may be based on certain assumptions, and then based on these assumptions to find out The solution to the problem; there are also a very small number of real professional elites who may see the real nature of the problem at a glance, and then continue to decompose the problem, and finally find the answer to the problem, this answer may shock everyone, because the problem The essence of the problem is very simple, and it is not as complicated as the other side. However, there are also some people who simply do not know what the problem is, let alone the nature of the problem.

But why are there only a very few people who can see the essence of the problem at a glance, then split the problem, and finally directly find the solution to the problem? The answer is simple because their knowledge is systematic.

When it comes to knowledge and ability, many people will say that ability is more important than knowledge. But Lao Wang believes that knowledge is the carrier of ability, and ability is only the manifestation of knowledge, and no one is more important than the other.

For example, it is difficult for headhunters to promote the candidate's job-hopping because of certain things, and these head-hunters will say that there are objective reasons in N why they have not made the candidate's job-hopping. And it's scary that there's nothing subjective about it. Suppose Lao Wang encounters people who always talk about objective reasons and ignore subjective reasons, even if the subjective reasons only say that they are insufficient in ability, etc., they will be dismissed directly when they encounter these people. If these people are placed in the company, they will only cause the greatest inconvenience to other people in the company. Fairness will also allow good people to secretly find good opportunities and leave your team or company. The reason is very simple, because the leadership determines the judgment, good employees do not want to be in the company of pigs, such a team or company will not go too far.

Let’s analyze the reasons why headhunters can’t push candidates to change jobs. We might as well list the reasons first, such as: the client company’s reputation is not good, the salary does not meet the candidates’ expectations, and the candidate’s current company boss knows that the candidate is about to change jobs. Is it because the candidate is unwilling to change jobs because the candidate is offered a salary increase or because the candidate's job-hopping is basically a pretense, but after getting an offer from a headhunter-recommended company, he asks the boss to negotiate the salary (generally the most foreign-funded companies, Lao Wang encountered have been such candidates) or because the candidates did not dare to rashly change jobs due to housing loans, car loans, etc., worried that they would not be able to keep up with the cash in their hands, or because of the opposition of the candidates’ family members, etc. List the problems first, and then analyze a little bit to find the problem. You may want to ask Lao Wang here. This question is very simple. Just call the candidate or have a meal and chat with the candidate, and just ask the candidate. In fact, you are wrong. The candidates will not give the real reasons. The candidates will not say the real reasons or it is difficult to explain them. They are all reasons that are irrelevant and affect your judgment.

This requires you to have a strong ability to judge, otherwise it is really difficult to do a good job in headhunting. There are also some people who get a lot of money back a year, all of which are based on the accumulation of resumes and are obtained by their own hard work and hard work. These consultants will not last for a long time. As a headhunter, you still have to have your own knowledge reserve and judgment on things, otherwise you will never become an impossible substitute. It has become irreplaceable. You are really an iron-clad and flowing soldier, always on the move.

The essence of the problem can be seen at a glance, and it requires ability, and the source of ability needs knowledge as the basis, and also requires strong social practice. Otherwise it is bragging.

Or do I need to figure out what the problem is first? Then find out what causes these problems to occur? Then find a solution to the problem, and finally solve the problem.

Lao Wang may be a bit abstract in writing these, but the essential topic of solving problems is inherently abstract, and he needs to really learn to think and use his brain to think.

Well, I'm going to work, and everyone is welcome to discuss and improve together.