From establishment management to contract management, can the hospital still retain excellent doctors?

As we all know, in this round of public institution reform, although hospitals still retain the nature of public institutions, doctors have lost the establishment of public institutions and become contract workers of hospitals. After doctors break the shackles of identity and organization, they will inevitably usher in a faster and larger flow. It is estimated that such reforms are most popular with private hospitals, because they can justifiably and more advantageously dig into the corners of public hospitals. Of course, for ordinary medical staff, there is no such worry. Even if you want to be dug yourself, it depends on whether someone wants it. But for those excellent doctors, backbone doctors or experts in the hospital, it is a big problem that the hospital has to face.

Without the constraints of identity and organization, can these excellent doctors be bound by just a contract? Can you stop them from being dug into a corner? Maybe this is really a problem.

First of all, the most critical factor for poaching is salary. Especially for private hospitals, this should be the biggest weapon. Of course, the same is true for other hospitals that are preparing to poach people. As long as the treatment is high enough, it is also very attractive to excellent doctors. This should be the primary means for each medical unit that is preparing to poach people. In this way, the more upper-level hospitals, the more large-city hospitals, and even private hospitals, are likely to poach people. The grassroots hospitals may become the bases for talent training in these hospitals. After the talents are cultivated, they may be poached at any time. Everyone knows that it is very difficult to train a qualified and excellent doctor. Therefore, this situation is a problem that must be prevented and must be faced by hospitals at the grassroots level.

Of course, it would be unrealistic to poach a large number of people from grass-roots hospitals just by raising wages, especially for private hospitals. Let's not talk about the constraints imposed by contracts on doctors. It is only a medical platform, resources, and room for growth. The gap between private hospitals and public hospitals is still relatively large. At present, it can be said without hesitation that almost all the best medical talents are concentrated in public hospitals, the highest scientific research level is also reflected in these public hospitals, and the best resources are also concentrated in these public hospitals. It is still unrealistic for private hospitals to easily poach excellent doctors from public hospitals. Unless he digs up some doctors who have no room for improvement, or doctors who are about to retire, this possibility is relatively high.

For young doctors, the reliance on public hospital platforms, resources, and the environment should exceed reliance on salaries. After all, if you want to improve technology and ability, you can only do it in these public hospitals, and it is difficult to do it in private hospitals. What's more, after the reform, doctors lost their establishment and identity. In terms of salary, it is possible to implement a salary standard that is completely different from other institutions, and the principle of distribution according to work can be more emphasized, and the treatment of doctors will inevitably usher in an improvement, especially for excellent doctors.