Behind the change of Henan green code to red code, the good and the evil of technology are hidden

arts/

The media combing is related to the village banks, that is, the money that some residents deposited in the village banks disappeared. Then, according to today's financial informatization, from a technical point of view, this is impossible, and it is very easy to investigate and deal with. Even after the personnel inside the village bank deletes the computer data, it is still possible for the relevant departments to intervene. restore the data.

Therefore, from the perspective of big data information alone, as long as these deposits have actually occurred, then as long as a case is filed and investigated, the truth can be revealed quickly. This is the benefit of big data and financial informatization, because technology does not will lie.

So the question now is whether these deposits are a pre-set financial fraud, or whether it is reported by the media that village banks or related stakeholders used the formal procedures of village banks , and then privately launched a WeChat applet platform, Then let the user deposit money into a fake account through these fake Li Gui programs, and the money is not recorded in the bank's system at all.

If this is the case, then this case will not be a simple case, and it is not something that ordinary people can do. This is blatantly using the banner of a village bank, and then privately and premeditated to absorb deposits. This nature is even worse than P2P. However, this kind of premeditated fraud is still easy to investigate and deal with in the face of big data. All data streams have memories and places.

So we come to the second technical level, which is the level where the green code turns into a red code, that is to say, some deceived depositors of village and town banks have to defend their rights after discovering the problem, and then they are artificially manipulated by the relevant departments. Turn green code into red code. There are two problems here. First of all, who has the power to use the health code for epidemic prevention? This belongs to local disease control, then village banks belong to local finance, so let the local disease control use the health code restrictions according to the instructions of the local finance. These people defend their rights, and there must be greater power behind them;

Secondly, who gave the local government so much power to allow the health code used for epidemic prevention to be used for other purposes at will, so is this kind of random violation of citizens' big data privacy rights equal before the law? If so, those who are involved in violating citizens' big data privacy should conduct criminal investigations in accordance with the Big Data Privacy Protection Law.

Going back to the level of technology itself, there is no good or evil in the health code itself, nor is there any good or evil in financial informatization itself, and the technology is always neutral. Behind the ability to make technology into good and evil are people who interfere with the use of technology, and what happened in Henan has shown us that the abuse of power by local government personnel whose health codes are outside of epidemic prevention has led to the collapse of the local government's credit and image. The use of health codes will be questioned.

That is to say, what is the significance of the current nucleic acid test when the health code can be manipulated by local government personnel at will according to their own intentions? How can we be sure that our yellow code and red code are really caused by the epidemic? Of course, some western countries led by the United States, including the backward Thailand, will also begin to withdraw the health code from the field of life because of the end of the epidemic. Behind this is the concern about the privacy crisis of citizens brought about by the accurate monitoring of the health code.

However, our Great Henan has truly staged the abuse of power to control the health code, making the health code a tool to limit the legitimate rights of citizens. This is not the attitude that technology should have. Technology itself has no good or evil, but it is people who make technology have good and evil attributes.