Have you encountered some strange interviewers or encountered some very strange interview questions during the interview process? Taking this opportunity today, let's take a look at a difficult problem that Xiao Dong asked her when she went to a company for an interview some time ago.

Of course, this problem is not easy to solve, but there are various answers in the process of solving it, and the interviewer finally likes Xiao Dong's answer, let's take a look.

How to distinguish between drinks?

The interviewer is almost here, tell all the job seekers directly, you can enter this company if you solve this problem today, but there is a premise: it does not mean that you can enter if you solve all of it, but Of all your solutions, I'll pick the best one, and after picking the best one, I'll let you into the business.

If none of your answers is the best solution, then I'm very sorry, you still don't have any qualifications to enter this enterprise. The interviewer saw that what he said was almost the same, and then told all the job seekers: OK, I will announce the interview questions next. Suppose I have 10 pounds of wine here, but I can't evenly divide it, because I don't have a 5-pound container.

I only have a 6- or 7-jin container, so how can you divide the 10-jin wine into two parts? That is to say, it is divided into two 5-jin wines. After the interviewer asked this question, one of the job applicants was dissatisfied and stood up and told the interviewer:

Interviewer, you should not ask such questions. We came to this company only with our real materials to qualify for this interview. We also hope to gain the favor of the interviewer through our real strength. . The question you asked, the donkey's lips don't say the horse's mouth, and it can't test anything at all.

Why ask this question? After listening to the interviewer, he told him: You don't need to worry about why I asked this question, you just need to say the answer . Some job seekers thought about it, and had no choice but to leave the company. After all, this company is unreliable.

Some other job applicants, including Xiao Dong, stayed. One of the job applicants stood up and told the interviewer that his parents were selling fish, so he could easily know how much a pound weighed, and there were deviations before and after. Usually no more than 10%. That is to say, if it really doesn't work, I can weigh it. Although I can't say that there are no mistakes 100%, the difference is relatively small.

I was willing to rely on my special skills to enter this company. The interviewer shook his head and said: No, no, this is not the correct answer at all.

Another job seeker stood up and said: If it really doesn't work, then pour the wine into a 6-pound container first. At this time, there will naturally be 4 pounds left. Pour 4 pounds to me. I want the less, let me. They want more, and it's only a pound or two short of it anyway, and I don't care.

After listening to this, the interviewer burst out laughing and said: How do you know that some of the wine was distributed to you? If these wines are distributed to the boss of the company, a little more here, a little less there, then it would be a big taboo, this is still wrong, do you think there is a correct answer?

This job seeker's answer just reminded Xiao Dong, yes, I can put these wines in a 6-jin container, and I can also put them in a 7-jin container. Is it ok.

I first pour 10 pounds of wine into a 7-pound container, then the 10-pound wine will have three pounds left, and then I will pour the 7-pound wine into a 6-pound bucket container. In this case, the 7-pound container There's only a pound left in it. I put this pound of wealth aside, and then poured 10 pounds of wine into a 7-pound wine container, and then poured the 7-pound wine container into a 6-pound wine container. Jin to come.

I take out another ten-jin wine and pour it into a nine-jin bucket, and then pour it into a six-jin bucket. I need to repeat it 5 times, and I can get a 5-jin wine. Then I repeat it five more times, and I have to get another 5 jins, so it's almost the same.

How do you feel about such an interview?

After listening to it, the interviewer said: Your answer is the most correct answer in desperation, because you have invisibly deepened a condition for everyone. This condition is that we have a lot of time for wine, and then a lot of 6 pounds or The 7-pound container was then pieced together by inadvertent patchwork, and finally two 5-pound wine.

In fact, this answer is somewhat off-topic, the reason is very simple, because I did not say that this wine is fixed, or there are many servings. You took a loop, but it doesn't matter, the loop you took is more or less in line with my wishes.

Furthermore, your answer should be regarded as a more reliable answer among all their unreliable answers. It shows your high IQ and also shows your high emotional intelligence. Congratulations, you can enter our company. .

Guys, what do you think of this interview? You are welcome to leave a message in the comment area. In the end, there is a small question to ask, can such an interview really select good candidates for the company?