The five major differences between the chairman and the general manager are confused by many people

In many units, the chairman and the general manager are always chosen by one person, but in essence, the difference between the chairman and the general manager is still very obvious. The most important thing is the following five differences. Many people refer to these differences. Confused, resulting in some deviations in my understanding, let's take a look at what these differences are?

[1] Difference 1: The chairman's decision is made by the general manager - the general manager's responsibility is to implement the chairman's decision.

Many people regard the general manager as a decision maker. In fact, in any unit, the chairman is the real decision maker. The chairman points out the direction, and then the general manager follows the direction indicated and the chairman makes decisions. , convert it step by step into achievable goals, and then convert these goals step by step into the daily behavior of each level of the company, and the team results on the last day, to realize the decision of the chairman.

[2] Difference 2: Chairman's direction, general manager's goal - the general manager's responsibility is to transform the chairman's direction into an executable goal.

This difference is also very obvious. The chairman manages the direction, and the general manager manages the goals. If the chairman manages the goals every day, but forgets his responsibilities and forgets that formulating his own strategy is his core task, it is easy for directors to appear. There is a deep conflict between the CEO and the general manager, which eventually leads to internal friction in the enterprise. Therefore, on this issue, everyone must have a deep understanding. This difference must be understood by everyone before it can be truly applied to our management practice. .

[3] Difference 3: The chairman is reticent and the general manager is pragmatic - the chairman provides the general manager with more resources and a more relaxed environment, while the general manager actually gets things done.

Under normal circumstances, the chairman is mainly in retreat, talking about strategy, planning ideas, going above the corporate culture, and developing external relationships, while the general manager is actually engaged in operations, and there are a lot of results every day. The chairman explained that by persevering day by day, the chairman and the general manager can perform their respective duties and realize the good operation of the enterprise.

[4] Difference 4: The chairman guards the risk, the general manager takes the risk - the chairman guards the final risk bottom line, and the general manager bears the risk of the business process.

The chairman must have closed the last risk. Therefore, the chairman manages money more, because this is the weather vane of risk. If the risk of breaking the capital chain is found, the chairman will find out at the first time, and he will take various measures. Therefore, in many cases, some decisions made by the chairman are inconsistent with the market environment, and even, in special times, what they are going to do is regarded as a lunatic and a fool, and many times Doing business is not profitable. It is not that they do not want to make money, but the tasks at each stage are different. At this point, everyone must understand the logic behind it.

[5] Difference 5: The chairman makes resources, and the general manager raises demands—the chairman sets up the stage, and the general manager sings his tricks well.

This difference is easy for everyone to understand. The chairman holds a lot of resources, the general manager puts forward the demand for resources, the chairman finds a way to set up the platform, and then the general manager performs on it, and the general manager leads the entire operation team , to operate the entire enterprise step by step.