It is not a good thing for leaders to suddenly arrange these three things for their subordinates, and they will be marginalized if they are not careful.
> > When leaders clean up their subordinates, they usually arrange these three things, and there is a risk of being laid off >
When the leader wants an employee to leave, in order to save the company unnecessary losses, they will not blatantly lay off people; instead, they will make various preparations in the work to achieve the purpose of making the subordinates voluntarily resign; usually the leader will When arranging tasks, if the subordinates do not listen to the arranged work clearly, the subordinates will not only not be able to hear the potential problems inside, but also the subordinates' work will not be smooth; these things arranged by the leader are enough to imply that the subordinates are leaving. If subordinates do not understand the problems in the task, they will not only be confused, but also suffer unnecessary losses; young people walking in the workplace must understand many decisions made by leaders, and subordinates are difficult to understand. When everyone encounters obvious signals, Don't act foolishly again. Only by improving your precautions and vigilance can you protect yourself.
After graduating from university, my friend Liu Ling found a job as a factory clerk. Lingling, who is 30 years old, has been working hard in the company for 7 years. Although she works diligently every day, she has not encountered any opportunity to be promoted. ;As age grows, many things are no longer suitable for Lingling to do anymore, but the leader has suddenly added a lot of tasks to Lingling recently, not only can't get off work as before, even if it is overtime, some things It’s not good either; Lingling is married and has children, she has no time to take care of her family in the face of work pressure; after everyone sees the leader’s attitude towards the leader, colleagues are also deliberately staying away from Lingling; because Lingling can’t stand it for a long time Due to the pressure at work, she had no choice but to leave her job; later, Lingling heard that the leaders arranged a lot of tasks to rectify her intentionally, and the purpose was to let her leave by herself.
As long as everyone observes carefully in the company, many signals of the leader can be detected, especially the change of the leader's work arrangement, and the leader must have his own ideas; when everyone encounters such a signal, maybe the leader has already After preparing for their own goals, the leader arranges the work of the subordinates more, usually it is a small routine to let the employees go automatically. With the development of the matter, many subordinates ended up passively resigning; the following editor will share with you the three signals that the leader wants to lay off people. Friends who want to know, please follow the editor to take a look. !
> > 1. Leaders arrange a lot of things other than their own work for their subordinates >
When a leader no longer likes a subordinate, he will arrange for the subordinate to do things beyond the scope of their own work. In the real workplace, this is a common routine used by many leaders when running on a subordinate; especially when the leader suddenly puts the work of other colleagues When you give it to yourself, you can only make things worse for yourself, who is already full of workload. Even if the leader knows his workload, but still does it, then the performance of the leader is obvious; Busy and overwhelmed, until the subordinates can't stand to take the initiative to resign; when the subordinate chooses to resign, the leader's purpose is achieved; not only saves the company a lot of money, but also makes the subordinates who don't like leave his sight.
> > 2. The leader suddenly handed over the important work of the subordinate to others >
In addition to arranging a large number of tasks for subordinates, leaders also have other ways to clean up their subordinates; hand over the important work of subordinates to others to do, and then arrange some trivial chores. In this case, the ability of subordinates is generally limited. The decision to save time, but the decision of the leader will also make the subordinate lose confidence; another situation is that the subordinate's ability is not bad, the important work is almost completed, and it is obvious that it is handed over to others at this time. Deprive subordinates of their credit; when the leader cannot give a suitable reason and wants to force subordinates to make such a decision, then the subordinates’ rights at work will be overridden, and they can only choose to be forced to leave in the end.
> > 3. Colleagues stay away from a subordinate collectively >
When colleagues are collectively alienating a colleague, this is the most obvious exclusion. Since colleagues in the entire team do this, it means that everyone has the tacit approval of the leader, and even this situation is directly arranged by the leader; People inform themselves of the time and place, which shows that others already know the leader's attitude towards you, and they have made a choice to avoid being implicated; usually, leaders will choose to transfer their subordinates to avoid seeing such upset subordinates. Go to other departments and do some optional work; when the subordinate's job has no prospects for development, he will choose to leave after a long time.